Procesamiento de la contabilidad nominal en cuatro pacientes anglófonos con afasia

El déficit en el uso de los sustantivos incontables

Autores/as

  • Lucas Jesús Martínez Almagro Universidad de Málaga
  • Lidia Taillefer Universidad de Málaga

Palabras clave:

Afasiología, Psicolingüística, Neurolingüística, Agramatismo, Contabilidad, Processing, Afasia de Broca

Resumen

Esta investigación indaga sobre el procesamiento de la contabilidad nominal. De hecho, añade más evidencia a favor de una posible influencia del número semántico en el procesamiento de los sustantivos incontables en cuatro pacientes diagnosticadas con afasia de Broca, siendo su lengua materna es el inglés. Esto sugiere que el procesamiento de estos sustantivos sería un híbrido tanto sintáctico como semántico. Además, corrobora al igual que estudios previos, un déficit específico en la gramática de los sustantivos incontables.

Citas

Allan, K. (1980). Nouns and countability. Language, 541-567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/414449

Ash, S., Ternes, K., Bisbing, T., Min, N. E., Moran, E., York, C., & Grossman, M. (2016). Dissociation of quantifiers and object nouns in speech in focal neurodegenerative disease. Neuropsychologia, 89, 141-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.013

Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2018). Quantity judgment and the mass-count distinction across languages: Advances, problems, and future directions for research. Glossa: a Journal of General linguistics, 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.536

Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgements and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97(1), 41-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.009

Barner, D., Li, P., & Snedeker, J. (2010). Words as windows to thought: The case of object representation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 195-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410370294

Bisiacchi, P., Mondini, S., Angrilli, A., Marinelli, K., & Semenza, C. (2005). Mass and count nouns show distinct EEG cortical processes during an explicit semantic task. Brain and Language, 95(1), 98-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.054

Borer, H. (2005). Structuring Sense. Part I. Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001

Brannon, E. M., Abbott, S., & Lutz, D. J. (2004). Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy. Cognition, 93(2), B59-B68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.004

Chiarelli, V., El Yagoubi, R., Mondini, S., Bisiacchi, P., & Semenza, C. (2011). The syntactic and semantic processing of mass and count nouns: an ERP study. PloS one, 6(10), e25885. Accedido desde: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025885

<<https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025885>>

Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across language. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506

Chierchia, G. (2010). Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174(1), 99-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9686-6

Crepaldi, D., Aggujaro, S., Arduino, L. S., Zonca, G., Ghirardi, G., Inzaghi, M. G., & Luzzatti, C. (2006). Noun–verb dissociation in aphasia: The role of imageability and functional locus of the lesion. Neuropsychologia, 44(1), 73-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.006

Crutch SJ, Warrington EK. (2008). The semantic organisation of mass nouns: evidence from semantic refractory access dysphasia. Cortex, 43(8):1057-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70703-2

Davis, J. C. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206399

Doetjes, J. (2017). The count/mass distinction in grammar and cognition. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 199-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034244

Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

Domahs, F., Nagels, A., Domahs, U., Whitney, C., Wiese, R., & Kircher, T. (2012). Where the mass counts: common cortical activation for different kinds of nonsingularity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 915-932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00191

El Yagoubi, R., Mondini, S., Bisiacchi, P., Chiarelli, V., Angrilli, A., & Semenza, C. (2006). The electrophysiological basis of mass and count nouns processing. Brain and Language, 99, 8-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.108

Fieder, N., Nickels, L., & Biedermann, B. (2014a). Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00589

Fieder, N., Nickels, L., Biedermann, B., & Best, W. (2014b). From “some butter” to “a butter”: An investigation of mass and count representation and processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(4), 313-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.903914

Fieder, N., Nickels, L., Biedermann, B., & Best, W. (2015). How ‘some garlic’ becomes ‘a garlic’ or ‘some onion’: Mass and count processing in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 75, 626, 645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.031

Fieder, N., Wang, H. C., Biedermann, B., & Nickels, L. (2017). Counting on number: effects of number information on grammatical processing of mass and count nouns. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 1034-1047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1281428

Franzon, F., Zanini, C., & Rugani, R. (2018). Do non‐verbal number systems shape grammar? Numerical cognition and Number morphology compared. Mind & Language, 34(1), 37-58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12183

Frausel, R. (2011). Relationship Between Count/Mass Nouns and Shape/Material Biases in Novel Word Learning Tasks.

Frisson, S., & Franzier, L. (2005). Carving up word meaning: portioning and grinding. J.Mem. Lang, 53, 277-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.03.004

Froud, K., & van der Lely, H. K. (2008). The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: New evidence on the role of syntax and semantics. Journal of communication disorders, 41(3), 274-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.11.001

Gastaldon, S., Zanini, C., Arcara, G., Peressotti, F., & Franzon, F. (2016). Referential numerosity and morphosyntactic number agreement: A psycholinguistic study on Italian Qualche/Alcuni. RGG, 38 (2016), pp. 105-113.

Gillon, B. S. (1992). Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and philosophy, 15(6), 597-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628112

Gillon, B. S. (1999). The lexical semantics of English count and mass nouns. In Breadth and depth of semantic lexicons (pp. 19-37). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0952-1_2

Grimm, S. (2018). Grammatical number and the scale of individuation. Language, 94(3), 527-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0035

Grossman, M., Carvell, S., & Peltzer, L. (1993). The Sum and Substance of It: The Appreciation of Mass and Count Quantifiers in Parkinson′ s Disease. Brain and Language, 44(4), 351-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1993.1022

Grossman, M., Mickanin, J., Onishi, K., Hughes, E., D’Esposito, M., Ding, X. S., ... & Reivich, M. (1996). Progressive nonfluent aphasia: language, cognitive, and PET measures contrasted with probable Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(2), 135-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.2.135

Herbert, R., & Best, W. (2010). The role of noun syntax in spoken word production: Evidence from aphasia. Cortex, 46(3), 329-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.016

Jackendoff, R. (1991). Parts and boundaries. Cognition, 41(1-3), 9-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90031-X

Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1996). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introduction. Aphasiology, 10(2), 159-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039608248403

Krohn, H. S. (2016). La expresión del número nominal en bribri. Revista de Filología y Lingüística de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 42(1), 121-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/rfl.v42i1.25467

Kulkarni, R., Rothstein, S., & Treves, A. (2013). A statistical investigation into the cross-linguistic distribution of mass and count nouns: Morphosyntactic and semantic perspectives. Biolinguistics, 7, 132-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.8959

Kulkarni, R., Rothstein, S., & Treves, A. (2016). A neural Network Perspective on the Syntantic-Semantic Association between Mass and Count nouns. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 6(2), 964-976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v6i2.5176

Laiacona, M., & Caramazza, A. (2004). The noun/verb dissociation in language production: Varieties of causes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2-4), 103-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290342000311

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press.

Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain sciences, 22(1), 1-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99451775

Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. Formal semantics: The essential readings, 127, 147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758335.ch4

Lima, S. (2014). All notional mass nouns are count nouns in Yudja. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 24, pp. 534-554). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v24i0.2419

Lima, S. (2018). New perspectives on the count-mass distinction: Understudied languages and psycholinguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(11), e12303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12303

MacDonald, D., & Carroll, S. E. (2018). Second-language processing of English mass-count nouns by native-speakers of Korean. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.363

Meyer, A., New, B., Pliatsikas, C., & Smolka, E. MultiPic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with multilingual norms.

Middleton, E., Wisniewski, E., Trindel, K., & Imai, M. (2004). Separating the chaff from the oats: Evidence for a conceptual distinction between count noun and mass noun aggregates. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 371-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.005

Mondini, S., Jarema, G., & Liguori, F. (2004). Semantics and syntax of mass and count nouns: data from aphasia and dementia. Brain and Language, 1(91), 138-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.072

Mondini, S., Angrilli, A., Bisiacchi, P., Spironelli, C., Marinelli, K., & Semenza, C. (2008). Mass and count nouns activate different brain regions: an ERP study on early components. Neuroscience Letters, 430(1), 48-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.020

Mondini, S., Arcara, G., & Jarema, G. (2014). Semantic and syntactic processing of mass and count nouns: Data from dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 36(9), 967-980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2014.958437

Odic, D., Pietroski, P., Hunter, T., Halberda, J., & Lidz, J. (2018). Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representation. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.409

Papafragou, A. (2005). Relations between language and thought: Individuation and the count/mass distinction. In Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 255-275). Elsevier Science Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044612-7/50066-4

Pelletier, F. J. (2012). Lexical nouns are both+ MASS and+ COUNT, but they are neither+ MASS nor+ COUNT. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0002

Prasada, S., Ferenz, K., & Haskell, T. (2002). Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff. Cognition, 83(2), 141-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00173-1

Quine, W., & Van, O. (1960). Word and object: An inquiry into the linguistic mechanisms of objective reference.

Redolar Ripoll, D. (2015). Neurociencia cognitiva. QUITO/UIDE/2015.

Renans, A., Romoli, J., Makri, M. M., Tieu, L., De Vries, H., Folli, R., & Tsoulas, G. (2018). The abundance inference of pluralised mass nouns is an implicature: Evidence from Greek. Glossa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.531

Rey, A. (1997). Rey: Test de copia y de reproducción de memoria de figuras geométricas complejas. TEA ediciones.

Rice, M. L., Cleave, P. L., & Oetting, J. B. (2000). The use of syntactic cues in lexical acquisition by children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(3), 582-594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4303.582

Rodao, F. (1982). El test de matrices progresivas de Raven: manual de aplicación y baremación española en preescolar y E.G.B. Ciencias de la Educació n Preescolar y Especial.

Rothstein, S. (2010). Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 27, 343-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq007

Saravani, A. G., Forseth, K. J., Tandon, N., & Pitkow, X. (2019). Dynamic brain interactions during picture naming. ENeuro, 6(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0472-18.2019

Semenza, C., Mondini, S., & Cappelletti, M. (1997). The grammatical properties of mass nouns: An aphasia case study. Neuropsychologia, 35(5), 669-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00124-8

Semenza, C., Mondini, S., & Manirelli, K. (2000). Count and mass nouns: Semantics and syntax in aphasia and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language, 74(3), 428-43.

Severo, O. T. B. (2019). An Experimental Study on the Interpretation of Bare Singulars in Mexican Spanish. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 27(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.27.2.575-601

Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E., Carey, S., & Grossman, M. (1989). Comprehension of lexical subcategory distinctions by aphasic patients: proper/common and mass/count nouns. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 32(3), 481-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3203.481

Sharvy, R. (1978). Maybe English has no count nouns: notes on Chinese semantics. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”, 2(3), 345-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.2.3.04sha

Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental science, 10(1), 89-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x

Stemmer, B., y Whitakear, H. A. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of the Neuroscience of Language. Academic Press.

Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38(2), 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90051-5

Srinivasan, M., Chestnut, E., Li, P., & Barner, D. (2013). Sortal concepts and pragmatic inference in children’s early quantification of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 302-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.01.003

Steinhauer, K., Pancheva, R., Newman, A. J., Gennari, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2001). How the mass counts: An electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 12(5), 999-1005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200104170-00027

Taler, V., Jarema, G., & Saumier., D. (2004). Semantic and syntactic aspects of the mass/ count distinction: A case study of semantic dementia. Brain and Cognition, 57(3), 222-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.050

Taler, V., & Jarema, G. (2005). On-line lexical processing in AD and MCI: An early measure of cognitive impairment? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19(1), 38-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.07.002

Troiani, V., Clark, R., & Grossman, M. (2011). Impaired verbal comprehension of quantifiers in corticobasal syndrome. Neuropsychology, 25(2), 159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021448

Witteloostuijn, M. V, & Schaeffer, J. (2018). The mass-count distinction in Dutch-speaking children with specific language impairment. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 3(1), 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.370

Wierzbicka, A. (1998). The semantics of grammar. John Benjamins.

Wiese, H., & Maling, J. (2005). Beers, kaffi, and schnaps: Different grammatical options for restaurant talk coercions in three Germanic languages. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 17(1), 1-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542705000012

Yin, B., O’Brien, B. A., & O’Brien, B. A. (2018). Mass-count distinction in Chinese-English bilingual students. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.382

Zwicky, A. (2001). Counting chad. Handout from Stanford Semantics Fest.

Descargas

Publicado

2023-03-08

Cómo citar

Martínez Almagro, L. J., & Taillefer, L. (2023). Procesamiento de la contabilidad nominal en cuatro pacientes anglófonos con afasia: El déficit en el uso de los sustantivos incontables. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 19(2), 1–12. Recuperado a partir de https://www.historicoeagora.net/revHUMAN/article/view/4919

Número

Vol. 19 Núm. 2 (2023): Monográfico: "La salud como objetivo"

Sección

Artículos de investigación (monográfico)

Licencia

Aquellos autores/as que publiquen con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:

  1. Los autores/as conservarán los derechos morales sobre la obra y cederán a la revista los derechos comerciales.
  2. Transcurrido 1 año desde su publicación, la versión del editor pasará a estar en acceso abierto en la web de la editorial, pero la revista mantendrá el copyright de la obra.
  3. En el caso de que los autores deseen asignar una licencia abierta Creative Commons (CC), podrán solicitarla escribiendo a publishing@eagora.org.